If you have a personal PC or Mac, you can register for one month of free use here:
https://plex.it/referrals/UPLGCKDK use my link register using your edu or gov emails to enjoy free one month

Our experiment used Comet Browser (powered by Perplexity.ai) to test whether AI can meaningfully review modules submitted to the Community Gallery.

The core question:
Can AI act as a useful assistant to review the modules currently in “Pending Approval”?
https://vle.learning.moe.edu.sg/admin/community-gallery?keyword=&location=COMMUNITY_GALLERY&resource=LESSON&status=PENDING_APPROVAL

Short answer: Yes — the initial results are promising.

AI can help surface issues, highlight missing elements, and provide a first-pass review (return and feature module with feedback). However, its recommendations still require human-in-the-loop oversight to ensure copyright and attribution, alignment with SLS "standards" covered in Chief CG email guidance.

Next steps
We will continue exploring this approach and report findings , as part of broader process re-engineering efforts, especially in light of manpower reductions. ( potential savings include: no crawling pending review modules out of SLS and assign modules to match to reviewers load and subjects/levels interest, no emails to 140 reviewers, no tracking of reviewer's load, no email to remind reviewers etc)

Possible landing 2026 Jan

Officer(s) run the AI browser on personal PC with our text prompt and watch if review is sound. Unsupervised automation is not recommended.

https://vle.learning.moe.edu.sg/admin/community-gallery

prompt to Comet to review modules in CG.

now review and click for me all these modules on the URL

1. https://vle.learning.moe.edu.sg/admin/community-gallery?resource=LESSON&location=COMMUNITY_GALLERY&status=PENDING_APPROVAL
2. Update us on the action you have taken:
   • Treat as New if the original featured module is very different from this module else return the module and ask the teacher submitter if the intention is to replace old module or treat as new. With the review details, decide on the correct course of action.
   • Feature to Gallery,
   • OR Return to the teacher
3. If required, edit the title to be specific and informative.
4. Ensure that the module is tagged to the relevant subject and level. If it is not tagged, assist to tag as necessary.
5. Check for a module description and a https://www.google.com/url?q=https://vle.learning.moe.edu.sg/mrv/community-gallery/lesson/view/3dc58759-7e61-4684-9b79-c8940ff6d33b/cover&source=gmail&ust=1765195278789000&usg=AOvVaw3cngoTxn3xNJUc9vYoyRQn">featured image with source cited https://vle.learning.moe.edu.sg/mrv/community-gallery/lesson/view/3dc58759-7e61-4684-9b79-c8940ff6d33b/cover . If these are absent, return and inform the author to do so using the Admin Reviews.
6. If the module uses any AI-enabled feature(s), ensure that the relevant feature(s) are tagged under keyword tags in Module Settings. Use the tags below where appropriate (AI-enabled tools):
   • AFA (Annotated Feedback Assistant)
   • ALS (Adaptive Learning System)
   • FAMath / FA Math / FA_Math (Feedback Assistant – Mathematics)
   • LEA (Learning Assistant)
   • SET (Speech Evaluation Tool)
   • SAFA (Short Answer Feedback Assistant)
7. If external AI tools are used in the CG module submitted, include (copy and paste) the following advisory under the module details:Teacher's Note: This module involves the use of Generative AI tools for students. As such, please ensure that the age advisories of the use of these platforms are adhered to, according to the platform's Terms of Service. You can also refer to the https://www.google.com/url?q=https://intranet.moe.gov.sg/etd/edtechmp2030/Pages/ST2.aspx&source=gmail&ust=1765195278789000&usg=AOvVaw24FX8MjKcLPud-56dgxXhP">"Quick Guide to Generative AI tools " (accessible via intranet) for more guidance.
8. For a modules that uses commercial chatbot (outside SLS), ensure it complies with the platform’s Terms of Service and age restrictions. If a platform is for users aged 13 and above, ensure that modules for Primary-level students do not include them.
   Where possible, test the chatbot with the sample prompts to check that the responses are age-appropriate:

1. For Mother Tongue Language modules, select the respective language under Module Settings - Langauge Localisation - 中文, Bahasa Melayu, தமிழ்மொழி
2. For quizzes, consider assisting to include the subject/level, content map and learning objectives for use in Learning Progress.
3. To be used in CG modules, free internet resources must meet all of the following:
   • The resource must be freely accessible on the Internet (i.e., not behind a paywall or login).
   • The source URL and the date of access must be clearly cited.
   • Proper attribution must be given, including the author’s name and the title or a clear description of the work.
   • The resource must not be a known infringing or pirated work.
   • If any one of the above conditions is not met, the https://www.google.com/url?q=https://infojustice.org/archives/43799&source=gmail&ust=1765195278789000&usg=AOvVaw35-dAsUp4IL7NnocF0V8v2">Singapore's Copyright Act 2021 does not apply.
4. Return module(s) that:
   • contain or link to inappropriate/sensitive content
   • infringes copyright and/or crediting of external content is absent.

Additonal notes,

1. you tube are already cited so further citation is not necessary

2. only check images for some level of fair attribution 

3. if missing module description, just add for the teacher, no need to return. 

4. as far as possible try to edit the module where suitable to have AI features turn on

5. if it is a minor edit, do it for the teacher and feature it.

6. unless the module is for very poor quality, incomplete, or has harmful or sexual content, then return the module with good reasons

use this and email https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/#inbox

compose an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

with Summary of Completed Task: with details of actions taken and what was good about the module to be featured.

and also post on the admin review post the same content for ease of understanding why the module is published.

 Perfect! The module "P4 PE - Gymnastics (Sequence)" has been successfully featured in the Community Gallery! I can see it's now listed at the top of the Manage Community Gallery page with the status "Featured".​

Review Summary for P4 PE - Gymnastics (Sequence):

✅ Module Successfully Featured

Actions Taken:

1. Added Module Description: Created a comprehensive module notes/description explaining the lesson objectives for Primary 4 students

Review Findings:

Strengths:

• Title: "P4 PE - Gymnastics (Sequence)" - Clear, specific, and informative ✓
• Subject & Level Tagging: Properly tagged as "Physical Education - PE" and "Primary 4" ✓
• Content Map: Tagged to "Pri 4 Physical Education - 2024" ✓
• Image Attribution: All images properly credited:
  • Stretching Exercises chart: Credit: Quickfitposters.com
  • Body Shapes diagram: Credit: Tiny Tumble
  • Pathways diagram: Credit: Proven PE
• YouTube Videos: Embedded videos from credible sources (Dranesville Elementary PE, Teach Learn Grow) with proper external content disclaimers - no additional citation needed per updated guidelines ✓
• Module Structure: Complete and well-organized with 5 activities:
  1. Safety Precautions
  2. Warm-Up
  3. Recap on Balance, Rotation and Pathway
  4. Plan and Perform a Gymnastic Sequence
  5. Lesson Feedback
• Content Quality: High-quality, age-appropriate content with clear learning outcomes
• No AI Features Needed: Module is primarily focused on physical education activities; AI features like SAFA not applicable

Minor Edits Made:

• Added module notes/description (previously empty)

Result: ✅ FEATURED - Module approved and published to Community Gallery. Teacher (Tan Yew Wee) has been notified.

You've hit your weekly assistant limit for automated browser tasks.